The Foreign Office said on Saturday that it was surprised by the ‘negative tone’ of statements from some countries, including the United States, regarding the general elections in Pakistan on February 8.
Earlier, the US, UK, and the European Union raised questions about the ‘credibility of polls and lack of fairness’ in the 2024 elections.
In response, the Foreign Office stated that these statements didn’t consider the complexity of the electoral process or acknowledge the free and enthusiastic exercise of the right to vote by millions of Pakistanis. The statements, according to the FO, also overlooked the fact that Pakistan held the elections peacefully despite serious security threats from foreign-sponsored terrorism.
The FO clarified that there was no nationwide internet shutdown, only mobile services were suspended for the day to prevent terrorist incidents on polling day. It emphasized that concerns expressed by many were unfounded, as the election process proved successful.
While appreciating constructive advice, the FO stated that negative commentary before the completion of the electoral process is neither constructive nor objective. Pakistan remains committed to building a stable and democratic society, driven by the people’s aspirations and the vision of its founding fathers.
The Foreign Office concluded that Pakistan will continue working towards a vibrant democratic polity, not solely due to concerns from others but because it reflects the people’s aspirations.”
Here’s a simplified summary of what the countries said about Pakistan’s elections:
United States:
The US expressed concerns about restrictions on freedoms, electoral violence, and allegations of interference. They called for a full investigation into claims of interference or fraud.
United Kingdom:
The UK recognized concerns about the fairness of elections, regretting restrictions on political parties and leaders. They urged Pakistani authorities to uphold human rights and the rule of law.
European Union:
The EU regretted a lack of a level playing field, citing restrictions on political actors, freedom of assembly, and expression. They called for an investigation into reported irregularities and emphasized the importance of democratic values.