In a recent court case, a group of judges decided political seats. One lawyer argued that a political party, PTI, had its symbol taken away before an election.
Later, the court reinstated the symbol, but the Supreme Court disagreed. The lawyer also mentioned that PTI-supported candidates won many seats in different regions.
However, the election commission didn’t give them all the seats they thought they deserved. The lawyer compared this situation to a mafia taking land.
The judges and the lawyer discussed whether the party needed to participate in the election to get seats and if the election commission’s decision was fair.
They also talked about how other parties had gotten reserved seats in the past and whether the political party had submitted the right documents. Finally, they discussed if the seats should remain empty or if new elections should be held.